The Church and its Scriptures                             Michael Knowles

 

        Introduction

        The Problem

        OT Texts

        The Theodicy of the

        Book of Job

        The Recourse to

        Cultural Relativism

        A Catholic Response 1

        A Catholic Response 2

        Back to Hebrews 11

        Conclusions

 

Home

 

The Theodicy of the Book of Job

The Book of Job is surely one of the greatest achievements of all literature. Whoever wrote it was beyond doubt not just a mystic but also a writer of unbelievable imagination, tenderness, observation and skill (to appreciate which these texts, and indeed the whole book, should be read out loud). Job, sitting on a dung hill, suffering the loss of wife, sons and daughters, family, wealth and health, asks God to justify letting such evils happen to him. God will not be put into the dock by anyone. Instead, he says to Job:

 

“I will ask questions and you will answer.

                

Where were you when I laid the foundations of the earth?

Who set its corner stone in place

When the morning stars sang together

And all the sons of God shouted aloud?

Who watched over the birth of the sea

When it burst in flood from the womb

When I wrapped it in a blanket of cloud

And cradled it in fog?

 

Have you descended to the springs of the sea

Or walked in the unfathomable deep?

Have the gates of death been revealed to you?

Have you ever seen the door-keepers of the place of darkness?

Have you comprehended the vast expanse of the world?

 

“Has the rain a father?

Who sired the drops of dew?

Whose womb gave birth to the ice?

And who was the mother of the frost from heaven

Which lays a stony cover over the waters

And freezes the expanse of the oceans?

Can you bind the cluster of the Pleiades

Or loose Orion’s belt?

 

Do you know when the mountain goats are born?

Do you attend the wild doe when she is in labour?

Do you count the months when they carry their young,

When they crouch down to open their wombs

And bring their offspring to the birth?

 

Did you give the horse his strength?

Did you clothe his neck with a mane?

Did you make him quiver like a locust’s wings?

 

Is it for a man who disputes with the Almighty to be stubborn?

Should he that argues with God answer back?

 

Then Job answered the Lord:

I know that thou canst do all things

And that no purpose is beyond thee.

But I have spoken of great things which I have not understood.

Therefore I melt away

I repent in dust and ashes”.

 

The writer of Job is Old Testament through and through. For him (or her –the imagery of the book is very female throughout) God is the doer of all things, both good and evil. Like for the prophets who unhesitatingly say that God himself directly creates evil to punish Israel whenever she like a faithless wife abandons his ways;  like for the authors of the books of Numbers, Deuteronomy and Judges who with no theological qualms or misgivings whatsoever say God brings the most terrible evils upon the men, women and children of Israel’s enemies, takes their land off them and reduces whichever survivors there might be to drawers of water and hewers of wood. The writer of Job describes God as himself responding to the jibes of Satan by killing Job’s sons and daughters with a whirlwind, having the Sabeans swooping down on his herdsmen and putting them to the sword and sending sheet lightning to burn up his shepherds and his sheep, and letting Satan smite Job himself with running sores from head to foot. We are intellectually powerless before God says the writer.

 

 “Indeed I know this for the truth, that no man can win his case with

God.

He destroys the blameless and the wicked alike...

God himself has put me in the wrong

and he has drawn his net around me...

The hand of God has touched me “[1]

 

There then we have one answer. What God does, God does, and that’s all there is to it.

 

 “Then the Lord answered Job out of the tempest.

I will ask questions and you shall answer.

Dare you deny that I am just?

Or put me in the wrong that you may be right?

Have you an arm like God’s arm,

Can you thunder with a voice like his?”

 

In a way it is the response a super-power makes when challenged by lesser beings. Like Stalin sneering at the news he’d been challenged by the Pope: “Where are his battalions?”  Like a contemporary US president: “Do you think I’m going to let American soldiers answer to charges in some poxy international court of justice?” For all the insights, for all the sheer incredible imagery and beauty of language, the writer of Job is an Old Testament writer. That is why the Book of Job as a theodicy is a disappointment.[2]

The Job writer is limited by his understanding of his god. Power is what matters -like ‘Ulster will fight and Ulster will be right’. Might is right. It is not yet the fullness of time. The ‘promised inheritance...God’s better plan’ (Hebrews 11.39f) has not yet arrived -the moment when God made himself nothing (eanton ekenwsev), taking the nature of a slave.[3] So that escape hatch is closed to us. We cannot as Catholics throw up our hands as a gesture of our helplessness to understand and make do with that. Our Catholic faith tells us there are no contradictions. That God is good and can do no evil is both our faith and our philosophy.

<Previous | Home | Next>

 



[1] ‘Manus Domini tetegit me’ as sung in the Holy Week liturgy.

[2] cf Dr. Karen Kilby’s paper ‘Evil and the Limits of Theology’ which she gave at the CTA 2002, also published in New Blackfriars Jan. 2003. Her theme is that evil is beyond explanation, so there’s no point in trying to find a reason for it or a solution to it. Which, in a way, is how the Job writer tells it.  And basically  Milton. This is however a flight, not into mystery so much, as into unreason. Enticing but, in my opinion at least, theologically questionable. And pastorally it certainly presents problems. This raises a point which might as well be mentioned here. It would help a lot at CTA conference if, as far as is possible, the text of a paper down to be delivered, or at least an outline, were circulated in advance eg. by email by the speaker; or available upon arrival in the conference folder. There is such a wealth of important matter in these papers, they just cannot be taken in when they are read and heard for the first time, and therefore the discussion of them that immediately follows upon delivery will always be most inadequate.

[3] The ‘kenosis’ of God is fundamental to understanding the theological difference between Christianity and Islam. It and God being three persons, not just as doctrines but in their vast implications as to what God is and what the relationship of man to God and to each other, are the core of Christianity and what sets it apart.